What about work not provided in the workstream
We are now required to tick:
"completed the work related to this invoice and provided it in the Workstream"
This is irrelevant for a lot of us - almost all my work is installed on the buyer's server, or committed to their code repository, or similar, not sent through the work stream. This may work fine for graphic designers, but is silly for software developers.
This should be re-worded.
-
Official comment
Hi Code and More LLP
Do you think it could work by supplying an attached document with the code on? Or a screenshot/cap of the work you have completed contained somewhere on the workstream, either as an attachment or as a series of messages?
I am not a coder so don't know how you could do this?
Please let me know if I can help you with anything else.
Comment actions -
I have done similar things as a workaround in the past (when something had to be attached at some point before sending an invoice, but the current tick box was not required)
I am just not comfortable with having to tick the box with the current wording. It says "work has been provided in the workstream" rather than something like "evidence of work as been provided in the workstream".
Surely it is not beyond PPH's ingenuity to come up with wording that would cover all cases?
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
2 comments