Change The Fee Structure BACK Petition

Comments

11 comments

  • Ahmed

    100% agree with you .

     

    New fees structure is very very bad for sellers.

     

    Its like other website.

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Scott

    Please reconsider the sliding fee scale PPH. 

    I agree with Jamie's points above regarding the matter,  a handful of people are having their say in forums, but there are thousands more unheard voices around the globe who probably feel so powerless that they won't even speak up against it. 

    We get you need to make money too, but it's just the amount you're taking for the service you're actually providing doesn't quite tally with this new change.

    You created this 'ideas' section for a reason, you are only as strong as your freelancer community and we'll remind you that you are by no means the only platform. Someone could open a platform the exact same tomorrow with only 5% fees on any project and the game would be over. 

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Amanda

    Very unahppy with this.  As a PPH'r who has been on here for 10+ years this is yet another kick in the teeth for my efforts.  Clearly PPH have identified that most jobs are one offs or short in duration and will not reach £500.  I have very few that  go over.  Twenty percent is a huge commission to have to pay for what twill turn out to be most of the time.  This is grossly unfair.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Amanda

    This is a way to copntact Xenios direct:

    http://www.xeniosblog.com/contact/

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Vivienne

    Hi I totally agree with Jame, Scott and Amanda. There are a lot of things wrong. I always feel as if I am going to be penalised when something goes wrong. I have to charge VAT and with PPH fees imagine trying to make any money from this. I do less and less here and I am sorry as it was important in creating my business in 2011. Why would I ever put my contact list on PPH? The whole idea of having to use 3 bids for a "high value" job that might be £375 for a gazillion articles? It's madness. I am happy to support the platform as I do owe it a lot but the business modus operandi needs a serious overhaul. The clients need educating regarding prices - we do not work on Fiverr so fees should reflect the professional approach we all adopt. Completely fed up with these new changes and my efforts will have to go elsewhere. After 7 years that's quite something I guess...well, for me it is.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Catrina

    I had not received this notification, but I agree this is making it impossible to make any money here.

    I had logged on here to suggest that they make it clear if a price includes VAT or not, instead of me having to point it out. UK companies (and I mainly deal with companies on here) can claim that back, but at first glance it appears that I am more expensive to start off with.

    Now moving to the upwork pricing model is pricing me off the site. There are new freelancer sites out there who don't do this punitive charging.

    It is the customers that lose out in the end as the quality end will leave the site and go elsewhere.

    I have uncovered some good clients on here, but there are a lot of people wanting the impossible for next to nothing.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Toseef

    +1 to Jamie

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Rachel

    I completely agree.  I've never earned less money on this platform per job, and I've been working here for 5 years.  It's pure greed on the part of PPH.  What can we do about it?  

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Tomas

    I agree. For someone who's income fluctuates here on PPH it only means I end up paying whopping 20% every month!  It is greed ran practice with no benefits whatsoever. I don't see how it works for regular person unless for big team of freelancers that work for a single account . You add another 20% VAT and 40% total goes off your earnings. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • 0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Tomas

    Mohammed that link has been disabled. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.